When I sit back and think about her accomplishments, I cannot help but think that G-d has bestowed upon her a very large helping of blessings and abilities. She is one of the finest ladies I know. She has given very serious thought to moving to the upper midwest and would like to teach on the college level. Certainly she is more than qualified, and is, what I think most people would consider the quintessential definition of a moral and upstanding young lady (she is only 39). Yet, there is a problem.
One of the colleges she was considering applying to is Maranatha Baptist Bible College. When she was reviewing their website looking for information on any open positions and to whom she would need to forward her resume, she came across the following qualification:
- Faculty members must be fundamental Baptists by practice and conviction - Certainly meets this qualification .
- Individual life styles must be in conformity to Biblical teaching related to morality and virtue - No issue on this one either .
- The sanctity of the Christian home is guarded by never employing or retaining faculty or administrators who are or have ever been divorced - Here is the Problem! .
She is divorced. Her husband left her and her children to fend for themselves and he initiated the divorce proceedings not her. She does not believe in divorce however her particular divorce was not of her own choosing, it was her husbands and with no fault divorce law she could not prevent the court from granting the divorce even if she had been so inclined.
I am saddened that a college of Maranantha's caliber which teaches forgiveness and that "sins" once forgiven are no more; can possibly conclude that she should be penalized for the rest ofher life for one singular mistake. It appears as though Maranantha believes that they are better than she is and that is something I truly detest.
Knowing that she would not be considered for a faculty position with them she gave up on the idea of actually presenting her credentials, she was hoping however, to gain an understanding why the college is so dogmatic on this particular issue. She sent a very polite and courteous email to Dr. John Brock, Vice President of Academic Affairs, for an explanation. Suprise suprise, no response. So she sent him a second email; again no response. She sent an email a third time and again after a week no response.
Dr. Brock will not even give her the courtesy of explaining the justification of the rule and on what biblical basis it was made.
It is this elitist attitude that makes my stomach churn. In absence of a response from Dr. Brock one can only make assumptions as to motives and I think everyone can agree that assumptions are generally incorrect, but as humans, we all make them.
Maranantha as a private college can set whatever standard they so desire for their faculty and students and I would never argue that they do not have that right - they do. I do believe that since they call themselves "Christians" and claim to to be forgiving and compassionate, they obligate themselves to at least explain their reasoning and allow someone to disagree as long as that disagreement is given politely and courteously.
Bob Jones University for many years prohibited their students from engaging in interracial dating; I disagreed completely with their standard, but I also acknowledged that as a private university where students attend by choice and with full knowledge ahead of time what the rules are, in regards to dating, they have the right to impose such a rule. in 2000, Dr. Bob Jones III, BJU Chancellor, acknowledged that the policy was not based upon any particular biblical principle and he was throwing the policy out. I applauded him for having the courage to take such action as it eliminated a contentious issue which took away from the universities excellent academic record.
So I call on Dr. Brock to step forward and explain the policy and what biblical basis it is supposedly based upon. If for no other purpose than to eliminate an issue which will take away from the Colleges excellent academic record.
4 comments:
Don't you think your being a bit hard on them? they have the right to do whatever it is they want.
I stated exactly that in my comments. They are a private religious school and therefore have the right to set whatever standard they desire for their students and faculty. On that there is no question.
I am merely attempting to ascertain on what basis the policy was created and I do believe that since they have made such policy public, they do have an obligation to at the very least, explain their reasoning.
not to be a bug or anything...but i know Dr. Brock personaly and i think that he would understand and listen and attempt to help in that situation! i mean he has to abide by the rules too! but i have to say that Christian Universities and Colleges are at a point in time where they have to loosen up a bit more without compromising thier postions! And until then Christian colleges will be a "stickler" on little details like that!
Sarah,
I do appreciate your comments and I by no means am attempting to disparage Dr. Brock personally or professionally.
I do believe that an explanation is needed and as I previously said in its absence one is left to make an assumption; which I am sure we both can agree would be the lesser of the two choices.
Dr. Brock has so far refused to comment on the matter, as has Dr. Sturgill, although he did respond to her via email with a comment that the college president would address her questions, and Dr. Oats has yet to respond.
If a college is going to state a position / policy publicly I do believe they have an obligation to explain such position when questioned on it. That is not to say that it is wrong or they do not have the right to set such policies, I would be remiss in taking such a position and I have stated clearly they have the right to do so; what I found disheartening was the fact they have refused to even address her questions.
Again Sarah, I appreciate your comments.
Post a Comment